Saturday, July 16, 2005

Road Rants (That’s Bullshit!)

(Avi sleeps, clutching his precious food)
As I travelled through the plains of Pennsylvania, I realized that this is the third country I have blogged from within the last month. I’m such a world traveler! Had to say it. Anyhow, as this tin can zipped along the highway, I was struck by a lot of random thoughts. First off, the roads to Washington D.C. (,my latest destination,) are littered with tons of road kill. I’ve been on my fair share of highways, but DAMN! That’s a lot of street sausage.

Street meat. Crow chow. Coon corpses - You get the picture.

My other random ‘on-the-road’ thoughts are less smelly, but just as stomach turning. Lets fire some off. Each will be followed by the eternal phrase ‘That’s bullshit!’. Here goes:

- - - The yellow rubber bracelet known as the Livestrong Bracelet is meant to be worn in order to show solidarity with cancer patients and victims while also aiding in the collection of funds for cancer research. Now, most people are wearing them just to ‘be cool’, turning a meaningful idea into a mindless fad. As a result there are now tons of knockoffs being sold in dollar stores, Ebay, and some clothing shops. The money from those sales do not go to cancer research. They go to profiteers. Hmm, what’s another example of people profiting from cancer? Tobacco companies! You know what I think when I hear about industries squeezing a buck out of tragedy? I think (Here it comes!): That’s bullshit!

- - - In the July 14, 2005 issue of USA Today, page 10A contained an article with the headline British police seek mastermind. The writer, Thomas Wagner from the AP uses the phrase ‘terrorist attacks’ to describe the recent tragedy in London. Towards the bottom of the page, there is short piece written by Paul Leavitt (with wire reports) that describes Israeli forces moving into Tulkarem in an effort to capture the members of Islamic Jihad that were responsible for the recent slaughter of four Israelis. Rather than use the term ‘terrorist/terror attack’, Leavitt says ‘bombing’. This is in line with what Canada’s (government funded) CBC does, preferring the terms ‘gunmen’ or ‘militant’ rather than terrorist when it comes to reporting on Palestinian terrorism in Israel. When civilians are blown up in London, it is a terrorist attack. When it happens in Israel, it is a ‘bombing’. This type of double standard has been pointed out by countless organizations and advocacy groups, but it continues to exist and be perpetuated by the media. You know what? That’s bullshit!

- - - Cellphone companies have pretty much conquered the adult market, and now they are setting their sights on children. No-one knows what kind of negative effects one may suffer from prolonged (or temporary) cell phone use. These devices have not been around long enough for people to draw any concrete conclusions. All I know is this: Holding an ever-discharging battery against the side of your head on a regular basis is unhealthy. It’s just common sense. When you use a cell, that is exactly what you are doing. Children have thinner skulls, and that increases any possible risk to their wellbeing. Cancer rates have skyrocketed over the last couple of decades. Outside of population growth, one of the biggest factors is the enormous increase in digital devices, genetically modified foods, and signal transmissions. When you walk down the street (or sleep in your bed, sit on a toilet, stand on your roof, etc.) tons of radio/satellite/cell phone signals are ripping through your body in search of a receiver. Cancer is a genetic mutation. Prolonged exposure to foreign objects of an unquantified nature can cause mutations. Think about it. Cellphone companies sponsor studies, but the independent studies are the ones that find many more causes for concern. The cell companies know there are dangers but prefer making cash over caring about the wellbeing of their customers. Motorola is one of the bigger cover-up artists, even going as far as to alter a document in their favour, after it was presented to them by one of their hired researchers. (I read that in the Toronto Star a while back.) These cover-ups are…well… It’s such bullshit!

So, what do these three micro-rants have in common? Well they all describe evil groups of people that do not care about the needs of others. Cancer profiteers (bracelet manufacturers, tobacco and cellphone companies, terrorists) as well as people that value some lives over others (CBC, writer Paul Leavitt [and/or his editor] and the majority of the media). It’s a sick world people. All you can do is hide under your bed or/and apply pressure to the more powerful while raising your voice and writing lots of whiny letters. Also, you should invest in an earpiece for your cell.

If something weird happens to me in the near future, you can rest assured that it was committed as retaliation by one of the groups mentioned above. Probably a cell company. Those guys are such shmucks. Free weekends, my ass!

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Three very good points. Also, the case of "homicide" bombings over "suicide" bombings could have been pointed out.

The whole thing with cells is pretty darn sick too. And it's not that you can specifically blame cell companies for being evil because they want to sell their products, a useful one at that (I think it should also be mentioned that your comment about "Free weekends, my ass" shouldn't be blamed on the cell companies because that has to do with the service providers: ie. Rogers, Bell, etc.) but I'm getting off topic. While a cellphone is useful, the issue(s) I have a concern with is that they're targeting children in their marketing (or rather, they will be on a higher scale), that disgusts me, and that they're lying about the potential threats to kids.

Kids are susceptible, period.

It ain't right.

5:13 am  
Blogger Avi said...

Hey Snoopy! How's Toronto without me? Still in one piece?
I'm glad you liked the post. I could have said so much more about each bit, but there just wasn't enough space.
I was a little concerned that some of my cellphone ranting would come off as a little 'wacky conspiracy theory' in nature, but the facts (and lack of facts) backs me up.

Anyone else have a rant or just want to bitch? Is there a difference? Drop it all here. You'll feel better after.

8:26 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oohh...i want to bitch! And its not about anything you said. Its about U of T!! I HATE THAT SCHOOL! i hate ROSI, and i hate not getting into classes you need to get into for your major and in order to graduate!! BAH!!!!!!
well. I guess its a shoe box in front of Hillel for me, when I don't end up graduating. and then i can be that crazy person who yells at the nice little Jews who just want to relax and get a falafel. ah well, i knew it would come eventually.

10:05 pm  
Blogger Avi said...

Don't worry Soph, we can share that shoebox (or get a big boot box), cause I'll wind up a hobo too. I mean, I'm a freakin' English major! ROSI = the devil incarnate
Dammit, I want that Kabbala course! Don't lock me out ROSI! NO!!!!

12:11 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I'd like to mention a step some companies are taking in a good direction, to bring a little bit of a good note to this discussion.

This Monday, Toronto Star published an article in their business section about the Orcelle, an environmentally friendly shipping vessel. So environmentally friendly, that it's a zero emission vessel. That's right, zip, zilch, nil, nada, absolutely nothing! The shipping company that developed the Orcelle, Wallenius Wilhelmsen, mostly transports cars overseas and from what it looks like, they won't be making the switch to the Orcelle as their main vessel any time soon (they say it will be about twenty years till then). Nonetheless, that's a pretty big step in the right direction, especially considering the major part large shipping vessels take in pollution.

Now, that's not to say that WW isn't doing anything now. They've apparently already taken many steps to make their ships more environmentally friendly, such as reducing the amount of bilge water (that's water mixed with the engine's oil) that their ships output by a significant amount, even if they aren't as good as the Orcelle will be when it's running. And while it's true that they're mainly focusing on the renewable energy sources because they will cut costs due to fuel usage, they're showing that they understand the other positive reasons behind making ships like the Orcelle.

A hand to Wallenius Wilhelmsen, for trying to help make this planet return to a better, more healthy place to live.

4:51 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What courses will you be taking, Avi?

3:48 am  
Blogger Avi said...

You don't want to know!
Alright, I'll tell you.
So far, I'm in:
ENG213H1 S - The Short Story
ENG300Y1 Y - Chaucer
ENG328Y1 Y - Fiction 1900 - 1960
GER364H1 S - Hist Yiddish Cinema
HUN351H1 F - Hungarian Cinema (don't ask!)
NMC256Y1 Y - Mod Israel Lit and Culture

I'm hoping on getting into RLG343H1 F - Kabbala Judaism
and I'm awaiting confirmation/rejection for INI384H1 F, which is Critical Writing on Film. I would get rid of the Hugarian Cinema in exchange for it.

Feh.

A hand to Wallenius Wilhelmsen.

6:24 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home

___________________________________________________
<< List
Jewish Bloggers
Join >>
Copyright 2005-2011 - All Rights Reserved